Polar Bear Alley

This is a collection of northern stories - polar bear, arctic and otherwise from churchill, manitoba, canada - the polar
bear capital of the world.

It follows the polar bears of western Hudson Bay during their season on land from mid-July to November.

Polar Bear Blog
Today's Blog

Archived articles

Polar Bears of Churchill Book
Polar Bear Pictures
Polar Bear Articles

Munck's Cafe Publishing

Weather in Churchill, Manitoba

Hudson Bay Sea Ice Update

Tide Table for Churchill

 
            
 

Hudson Bay Post Archives - 10,000 Down

Typo in Time Magazine Makes Editor's Day

Sweet! The Hudson Bay Post editorial content is officially on par with Time Magazine! As judged by the Hudson Bay Post, of course.

Yes, in the July 18, 2005 Edition of Time Magazine, a classic ‘typo’ appeared in an article by Deborah Jones, entitled ‘Are Polar Bears on Thin Ice?’ Now, aside from the overused ‘thin ice’ cliche, this article contains the classic line - ‘...western Hudson Bay, where the bear population has declined from 11,000 to 950 in the past decade.’ You know, if this trend continues, our bears might be in trouble!

Okay, I am not going to gloat about this mistake through the entire article but to a guy who forgot the Russian Ambassador’s name and mispelled fur trade as furt trade, this is a true victory! I just sit here and read the article over and over - it is great! The beginning of the newspiece quotes Andrew Desrocher of the Canadian Wildlife Service talking about how the IUCN is considering raising the polar bear’s status to ‘vulnerable’, but not quite endangered. Sure, we have lost 10,050 bears on western Hudson Bay in the last ten years and we have just raised hunting quotas by 28%, but let’s take things slow here.

Before I get too carried away, this really is an issue for Churchill and Nunavut. Traditional knowledge and scientific research have parted ways when it comes to our polar bears. The western Hudson Bay population is thought to have been hovering around 1100 bears (not 11,000) for more than a decade now.

The Canadian Wildlife Service has been the main source of information about these bears, gathering data on these animals for over thirty years. They have just finished the latest three year population study and it appears that their new estimate will place numbers around 950.

Conversely, Inuit Qamanarjuat (traditional knowledge) indicates that the polar bear population has increased, maybe numbering 1400 bears now. This has resulted in the
Government of Nunavut increasing harvesting quotas for most Inuit communities, including the truly endangered McClintock population.

This is a dilemma and one that will likely be with us for many years. Canadian Wildlife Service is backed up by scientific evidence and field research. Inuit knowledge draws from 1,000 years of experience in this region.

Of course, scientific evidence has also resulted in overestimates of polar bear populations further north (again see McClintock Channel). Could these estimates be wrong again? Does it even matter considering the ice may be gone in fifty years?

On the other hand, Inuit Knowledge has not dealt with an exploding population, and the resulting growth of waste disposal sites throughout the Kivalliq region. Could these garbage dumps be attracting bears that would have otherwise avoided the communities?

So, maybe we could meet in the middle and just sit down and agree that there are 1100 bears. I mean we were all happy when there were 1100 bears, not 950 and not 1400. Sounds good to me.

But back to the Time article. In all truth, I feel bad for Ms. Deborah Jones. I know the sinking feeling when your article comes out and something (and there always is something) is screwed up or mispelled. Of course, if it was not a typo, then this is an open job offer to Ms. Jones. Come on up to Churchill! We never let the truth get in the way of a good story!

Or even better, media from across Canada and the United States should send as many film crews as you can to Churchill and Arviat and Rankin Inlet to investigate this issue thoroughly! Contact the Hudson Bay Post to make all your media arrangements and hire a local guide who will give you the real story about our bears on ‘thin ice’!

By the way, if anybody cares, polar bears can actually walk on ice that would not support the weight of a typical human being. They spread out their weight until they are almost walking on their bellies and kind of shuffle along. So maybe ‘Are Polar Bears Walking on Broken Glass?’ would be a better title instead.

- prepared by Kelsey Eliasson, first appearing in the Hudson Bay Post, Churchill, Manitoba's monthly newspaper published occasionally

 

 

Polar Bear Alley is a real place but not this place. It is a strip of white sand beach along the coast of Hudson Bay near the former site of the Churchill garbage dump. A beautiful place for a picnic if you know how to handle a shotgun.

This version of Polar Bear Alley is created by Kelsey Eliasson in Churchill, Manitoba, Canada or more specifically at Camp Nanuq -a 'cottage suburb' twenty kilometres or fifteen miles east of Churchill. I also run a publishing house called Munck's Cafe and write a few books, including the newly released Polar Bears of Churchill, when not chasing bears of my porch.


Polar Bears of Churchill is a comprehensive guide to the Polar Bears of western Hudson Bay and their relationship with Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. It combines seven years of guiding experience in Churchill with the latest scientific research and some colourful local history. Independently published in Churchill, Manitoba.

Second Edition, ©2006, Written by Kelsey Eliasson
Photography and Map Design by Kelsey Eliasson
Additional photography by Northern Soul Adventures
and Polar Bears International
Retail price $14.95, 64 pages, full colour throughout.

Email polarbearalley here.